Lidl's plans to demolish two homes for Whitby store expansion dealt a blow
and live on Freeview channel 276
Lidl in Stakesby Road wanted to knock down 1a and 1b Castle Road, which it owns, in order to increase the size of the store’s car park and the warehouse.
The supermarket chain submitted its plans to Scarborough Borough Council earlier this year.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHowever, councillors on the authority’s planning committee decided not to make a decision on the plans instead they deferred the determination while they wait for more information.
Fifteen local residents had objected to the proposals, with three more writing letters in favour of Lidl’s plans.
Lidl scheme would create 20 more parking spaces and nine new parent and child spaces, a new entrance to the store and a new trolley bay.
A number of the objectors raised concerns about the increase in traffic in the area if the plans were to get the green light and noise caused by the store’s refrigeration system, though Whitby Town Council backed the proposals.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdWard councillor David Chance spoke at the meeting on behalf of local residents who wanted the plans thrown out.
Cllr Chance said the thought of the extension had caused “considerable stress” to neighbours.
Committee member Cllr Glenn Goodberry, who said he lives near the store, told the meeting he did not see why good houses needed to be demolished.
He also said that while North Yorkshire County Council Highways data had shown there had been no collisions in vicinity of the store in the last five years there had been “an awful lot of near misses”.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdCllr David Jeffels said that he thought it was “over-development” of the site.
He added: “It is going to impact on the quality of life of people living around [the store as it is] going to intensify the use of the store in terms of traffic and noise.”
Not all of the committee were convinced on the need to refuse the application.
Cllr Jim Grieve said the arguments for refusal seemed to be “emotional” and not based on “technical” reasons.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHis fellow committee member Cllr Paul Riley proposed that the application instead be deferred to allow for more information on the noise from the building’s refrigeration system.
Cllr Phil Trumper agreed that councillors needed more information on the system, which the council’s own environmental health officer had not objected to.
The plans will come back to the committee in the new year.
A message from the editor
Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.
In order for us to continue to provide high quality and trusted local news on this free-to-read site, I am asking you to also please purchase a copy of our newspaper.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdOur journalists are highly trained and our content is independently regulated by IPSO to some of the highest standards in the world.
The dramatic events of 2020 are having a major impact on many of our local valued advertisers and consequently the advertising that we receive.
We are now more reliant than ever on you helping us to provide you with news by buying a copy of our newspaper.
Thank you
Jean MacQuarrie, Editor-in-Chief
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.